Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Toastmasters: Toastmaster of the Meeting: Tradition

There are multiple roles to be fulfilled during a Toastmasters meeting, in addition to the actual speeches. They tend to assign new people roles for meetings in a way that eases them in: first you'll have an easy thing to do like word of the day or quote of the day, then lead table topics, and then move onto being an evaluator of a speech.

Eventually, though, they'll make you be Toastmaster. The Toastmaster (not to be confused with the title of "Distinguished Toastmaster", a title/certification earned through completing a series of speech and leadership projects) is essentially the host of the meeting. You obtain speech information and prepare an agenda, and introduce each speaker and the general evaluator, providing segues between sections and generally keeping things on track.


In our club that person also selects the theme for the meeting, and use that in your spiels between agenda items. Realizing that the meeting for next week (the last meeting before Christmas) would likely have a more specific holiday theme, I picked "tradition" and tried to subtly use my platform to no just discuss fun holiday traditions (though that happened, too), but push my agenda a little bit that not all traditions are benign (see: wedding crap series), but that as I've grown older I have nonetheless learned to savor some traditions that provide comfort in specific types of situations.


Traditions, especially those of the more ritual and ceremonial type, are something I'm often not a fan of. In fact, perhaps the most significant of my teenage rebellion (such as it was) (or at least the most hurtful to my mom) was refusing to participate in graduation ceremonies.

Traditions usually start for a reason - like my family has hot cider on Christmas Eve because it’s winter - but it’s now associated with Christmas Eve celebrations, and I’d continue to have hot cider even if I moved to Florida.

Especially for non-holiday traditions, there’s often a reason it starts that becomes irrelevant over time, like patriarchal expectations, that lead to the tradition becoming harmful down the road. For holiday traditions, they’re probably not harmful, but sometimes it’s fun to reevaluate them and the enjoyment they provide. As a newlywed, my husband and I have a bit of a free pass this year to think about which traditions each of our families of origin has, and choose which ones to incorporate into our own family.


Sometimes we might not agree with the origin of a tradition, yet still find meaning in them. The last funeral I went to was for a great aunt, about a month ago. She as Catholic, so the service was in her Catholic church, with many traditions that I was not particularly familiar with - there was a fabric draped over the coffing, a sprinkling of holy water in the service, before loading back into the hearse, and before lowering into the ground. Even though I don’t have my own connection to those traditions and necessarily believe in the reasons behind the rituals, it was nonetheless lovely to see the traditions that I knew meant something to her (and to her surviving daughter), in that transition of life.


As I mentioned before, my husband and I are starting our own family and thus our own traditions, coordinating with each of our own families to determine to spend the holiday. It’s been interesting to think about what stands out from my childhood - I realized that going to a Christmas Eve church service, since we’ll be here at home on that day rather than with my parents, is very important to me, even though I’m not a regular church-goer. But that’s simply how we spent the holiday growing up, and it provokes a feeling of ritual that I actually do want to continue.


Our table topics was facilitated by a different member, but of course based on the theme of traditions. She create some great questions about different types of traditions - such as a tradition you'd like to form, or a tradition you'd like to give up. My favorite response in table topics was about giving up a tradition - a member discussed how as a kid, her mom decided to make Swedish meatballs on Christmas Eve, which was quite an endeavor to make a huge pile of them. After a few years, the mom thought she might skip making them, since it was so much work, and asked the family if that was ok. Hesitantly, they each told her that they actually didn't really like them anyway!


The one thing I would hope you can take away from the theme today is to be particularly thoughtful about your traditions this holiday season, maybe doing away with one here or there that no longer holds meaning, but truly savoring the ones that are significant to you, and perhaps developing new ones to savor as well.

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Wedding Crap: The First Look

(See introduction and disclaimer to this series here, and other posts in the series here.)



What is the tradition? 

After getting ready separately, the bride and groom arrange for a photographed "first look" to see each other for the first time in their wedding finery. It's often set up so that the groom is waiting somewhere, with his back turned, and the bride approaches; it's the look on the groom's face when he sees her that is intended to be a particularly special moment and one that's desired to be captured in pictures.

What is the origin of the tradition?

When marriages were arranged by parents and essentially business transactions, the parents desired to keep the bride and groom apart until the ceremony so they didn't have a chance to decide they didn't like their chosen spouse and back out. Eventually this morphed into it being "bad luck" for the groom to see the bride before the ceremony.

Why do people still follow it?

Having a first look - either a pre-ceremony "first look" or having the moment as the bride enters the ceremony - seems to be viewed as a special, emotional moment. The bride is, obviously, all gussied up and looks not just like the woman the groom loves, but she looks like a bride! He's supposed to be overwhelmed with emotion at how absolutely beautiful she looks.

Having a separate first look before the ceremony is typically justified with one of two reasons: (1) to be able to take group photos including both the bride and groom beforehand, rather than taking up time in between the ceremony and reception to do so (cause, otherwise it wouldn't be allowed to take those groups photos cause the groom would see the bride!), or (2) because it's seen as an intimate moment between bride and groom, and this allows them to express emotions in privacy rather than in front of all the guests in the ceremony.

Why is that crap? 

Um, is the marriage predicated on the bride's good looks? I certainly hope not! While it's certainly not unreasonable to be gussied up for the occasion, for the bride to be so extravagantly beautiful for the sake of the wedding that the groom - who presumably has known her for quite some time, since it's not an arranged marriage - tears up in joy at the sight - that just screams icky, gross, superficial, obsession with appearance and virginity and ugh. Or it's a beautiful sight because she looks like a bride, rather than the actual human being that she is, also brings up thoughts of patriarchy and ownership and gender roles and other such disgusting things. Edited to add: after publishing, my mind was finally able to split out the words that had been on the tip of my tongue: Placing such an emotional value on this moment of appearances, not only objectives the bride, but almost fetishes her.

If you desire to spend some quiet time with your spouse-to-be in the midst of what is otherwise an often hectic day, and reflect on the importance of solemnity of the occasion, sure. But why bring this superficial obsession with looks and fanciness into such an intimate moment? Why put it into terms of the roles of "Bride" and "Groom", rather than the person you got to know over the course of your relationship, with whom you've chosen to spend the rest of your life?

What am I doing with this tradition?

Nothing! We both got ready at home, so saw each other in all stages of readiness for the day (pretty sure he saw me in curlers, gasp!). While I thought he looked handsome, and I'm sure (hopefully) he thought I looked beautiful, we also both looked like ourselves, so there was no stunning moment of a reveal.

How did/will you handle this tradition?

I would love to have a lively debate and conversation in the comments! Please join in!

Dissenting opinions (from the post itself or other commenters) are welcome, but I reserve the right to delete any comments that personally attack me or any other commenter.

Monday, December 8, 2014

Year of Running: 2014


Link-up with Miss Zippy. See also 2013 and 2012 editions.

Best race experience?

That's actually a tough call. A lot of new experiences this year, a couple new PRs, other races that were fun. I think overall I'd say the best was my first triathlon. This is a situation that involves not just pushing myself to my highest effort for the distance, but putting myself in situations where I'm literally fearing for my life (I know in my mind it's unlikely to actually be that dangerous, but my brain says otherwise) (i.e., the swim and bike, that is all but the run section). And yet I still finished it!

Best run?

Well, maybe just because it's fresh in my mind, but I'd say last week's track workout, where I hit paces I truly didn't know I was capable of for any amount of time longer than a millisecond. I've had some moments of disillusionment this year, particularly in regards to not having endurance for longer races at a pace I'd be happy with. But some of this speedwork is going ok; maybe focusing on and setting goals on shorter distances could be gratifying. 

Best new piece of gear?

This headlamp. I've actually owned this for a couple years, but only used it once or twice until this summer for the night leg at Hood to Coast. That convinced me that it's really not that uncomfortable, and has motivated me to get out and do more evening runs this year as the days have gotten shorter.

It has a nice spotlight in the front, and a blinking red light in the back. It's rechargeable via USB - I think it's lasted at least 5 or 6 hours without charging. 






Best piece of running advice you received?

From Abe, what basically boils down to "eat less crap" (those aren't exactly the words he used). 

Most inspirational runner?

Oh, this question is always hard! I am pretty impressed with my coworker, Meg, who also ran the Seattle half marathon, and got a sub-2 at her first half!

If you could sum up your year in a couple of words, what would they be?

New experiences!

This year's races: 

First Run 5k (new PR)
Bloomsday 12k
Helvetia 10k (new PR)
Foot Traffic Flat half marathon
Hood to Coast relay (first relay) (and my work got a team again this year :) )
Aluminum Man sprint triathlon (first tri)
Near Boring 8k
Seattle Half Marathon

Sunday, December 7, 2014

First Run 5k & Fight for Air Stair Climb Training Week 1

Workouts: 

Monday: Easy run 1.15 miles (15:31 pace) + plank 30 seconds

Thinking of doing a running streak for the month of December, so had to get in something today for that to be possible. Kept it at an easy effort level (typically 13:30 - 14:00-ish as of late), but obviously my body's still tired from the race!

Tuesday:  Stairmaster 5 minutes (22 floors = 13.64 sec/floor) + treadmill run 1.0 mile (13:34 pace, 1.0% incline)

I wasn't sure if the rec center gym near me had a stairmaster (only been there a few times to use the treadmill, but just hadn't paid attention to what other machines are there), but luckily it has two! I'm going to try to train on real stairs, too (my office building has 8 floors, so I think I can get some decent training with that), but to do some continuous longer climbing, this will be great.

Even though I'd looked up finish times for similar events and figured the race (80 floors) should take 15 - 20 minutes, I was still surprised to see how many floors, according to the stairmaster, I did in just 5 minutes, at a moderate but not too hard intensity setting. I have a feeling that climbing real stairs (and more gravity working against you, just like running outdoors versus a treadmill), won't feel quite as easy.

Wednesday: Track run 4.0 miles (12:58 overall pace)


Goal: 1 mile warm-up, 4 x 0.25 @ 9:00 (2:15) with 0.25 recoveries, 1 mile cool-down.
Actual: 
Warm-up: 13:42
4 x 0.25 intervals: 2:14 (8:55), 2:12 (8:48), 2:11 (8:44!), 2:14 (8:56) <--- those are all 8s!!!
4 x 0.25 recovery: 14:47, 15:55, 14:51, 15:40
Cool-down: 14:05

Goodness. Those intervals were certainly tough, but surprisingly doable! 

It's kind of fun to be doing some track work again - went a few times in the summer (we have a couple schools with tracks near by - one's a mile - ok, actually half a mile, but I can loop around a block to fit in a mile warm-up to get there - and one's about a mile and a half) but when the school year started I wasn't comfortable using the track while kid teams were using the field (allegedly it's considered ok/not rude, but I'm too self-conscious, plus it feels rude to me). But, I recently realized that with this cold weather there must certainly be a winter break from any outdoor sport practices!

Thursday:  Swim 1,000 yards + stairmaster 10 minutes (48 floors = 12.5 sec/floor) + treadmill run 1 mile (12:46 pace, 1.0% incline) + plank 40 seconds

Friday: Easy run 2.0 miles (13:35 pace)

Saturday: Tempo run 4.0 miles (12:08 overall pace, 10:55 tempo pace) + plank 40 seconds

Goal: 1 warm-up, 2 @ 10:40, 1 cool-down
Actual: 
Warm-up: 12:22 (mostly downhill)
2 tempo: 10:38, 11:12
Cool-down: 14:18

Oy, that was harder than I expected. The second tempo mile was mostly uphill, but even the first, mostly downhill (out-and-back route), one was tough. 

Sunday: Easy run 2.3 miles (13:54 pace)

Total swimming: 1,000 yards
Total running: 15.45 miles
Total stairs: 70 floors

Friday, December 5, 2014

November Goal Progress

Goals. January. February. March. April. May. June. July. August. September. October.

Try a new restaurant (of Abe's choosing) each month.

November was a surprisingly busy month, and it didn't happen.

YTD tried/required: 8/11

Try a new recipe each month.
Pesto potatoes - very good! 
Veggie borscht (not sure what website it was from) - ok.

YTD tried/required: 12/11 - yay!

Lose 24 pounds.


Starting weight (1/1/14): 152
Last weight (11/1/14): 144
Current weight (12/1/14): 146
Current gain: +2
Total loss: -6

Well, crud. Definitely prone to eating when stressed and busy, and slacked off some on working out.

Run 1,000 miles.

This month: 58.65
YTD: 569.05
56.91% of the goal; 91.51% into the year.

Bike 1,500 miles.


This month: 20.5
YTD: 607.55
40.5% of the goal; 91.51% into the year.

Complete a triathlon.


Swimming yards: 
This month: 4,500
YTD: 38,200

Obviously, there are several goals that I won't be meeting by the end of the year! :( Some of them, that's disappointing, but I realize that I didn't put in the work to meet them (like running and biking mileage - those really should have been doable). Others I don't care as much about the accomplishment now as I did at the beginning of the year (like barefoot running, or doing a pull-up - still things that I'm interested in, just not something that got prioritized and that's ok). 

I've been thinking about goals lately also because the 3-year span of my 30 Before 30 list is quickly coming to a close, and there are a lot more left than accomplished. And I'm not sure I care. Does that make a list of goals pointless? Have I still done more of these things than I would have done without the list? Does it matter whether I accomplish these things, when they're things that would be cool/fun to do, but don't necessarily significantly impact my quality of life?

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Planning to PR a 5k

When it comes to training for a half marathon or other longer distances, it's mostly about mileage - both long run and weekly total mileage. Sure, you should work in some speed work and tempo runs, especially if you're trying to PR. And I suppose once you're gunning for say, a 1:30 half, you probably have to do more specific training. But mostly, for beginner and back-of-the-pack runners, it's about getting used to (or re-used to) the total time on your feet and endurance to maintain a reasonably brisk pace for that long period of time.

For a 5k, however, if there is a similar straight-forward concept for setting a new PR (beyond just: do speedwork), I'm not sure what it is. I'd like to not only set a new PR (currently 33:32 - 10:48 pace), but one of my 30 Before 30 goals is to run a 5k in under 30 minutes. I turn 30 at the end of January.

29:59 = 9:39 pace = set goal pace at 9:30 to allow some cushion.

Well, since my fastest single mile pace recently is 10:02, and my fastest as an adult is 9:55 (about 18 months ago), I don't think I'm quite ready to run 3.1 miles at a 9:30 pace a month from now. I do, however, think I can aim for significantly below my current PR - I'm setting my goal for the New Year's First Run at a 10:00 pace (31:04). Depending on how that race goes, I'll evaluate whether I can find another 5k prior to the end of January to actually aim for the sub-30.

It's always been hard for me to adjust my pace for shorter distances - I tend to just go out at a comfortably brisk pace regardless of distance (not so good with making myself be uncomfortable); increasing that pace slightly for short races, but not by nearly as much as I know I should. Greg McMillan's website has a calculator to estimate what you should be capable of at different distances, relative to one distance that you have done. (Obviously, this is just a guideline - some people's bodies are better made for speed or for distance, which will make one end of the spectrum easier than the other. But they're good guidelines.)


Source - input current mile time and goal 5k time.

My plan is to do two speed workouts each week: one interval (0.25 mile repeats) and one tempo. Setting goal times for those workouts beginning with the "current times" that I should be capable of based on my mile time, and decreasing the workout time goals each week to move towards the "goal times" necessary to hit that 5k time.

I only have four weeks until the upcoming race, but already nailed the first week 1 interval workout - actually got all four intervals under a 9:00 pace! 

Week 1 
Interval: 1 wu, 4 x 0.25 @ 9:00 (2:15), 1 cd
Tempo: 1 wu, 2 @ 10:40, 1 cd

Week 2
Interval: 1 wu, 4 x 0.25 @ 8:30 (2:08), 1 cd
Tempo: 1 wu, 2 @ 10:20, 1 cd

Week 3
Interval: 1 wu, 4 x 0.25 @ 7:55 (1:59), 1 cd
Tempo: 1 wu, 2 @ 9:55, 1 cd

Week 4
Interval: 1 up, 4 x 0.25 @ 7:20 (1:50), 1 cd
Tempo: 1 wu, 2 @ 9:30, 1 cd

What's your best tool for PRing at shorter distances?

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Seattle Half Marathon 2014

I was looking for another race to keep myself motivated during the fall, and since we were going up to Tacoma for Thanksgiving weekend, staying up there through Sunday for the Seattle Half seemed perfect. I knew it was a bit of risk weather-wise, as 40s and rainy is pretty typical for both Portland and Seattle this time of year. I've previously done the Holiday Half in mid-December in Portland for my fall goal, and it was quite miserable! I was hoping being a couple weeks earlier in the year would make it less so.

I stayed at the Quality Inn a few blocks east of Seattle Center, so I only had about a quarter mile walk to the start line. Though it's a perfectly adequate motel, I wouldn't necessarily recommend it, per se. The location's very good relative to this race, and it is marginally cheaper than the other options in that area (there is also a Best Western, Travelodge, and Holiday Inn next to it, on John St just east of Seattle Center) (and they're all way cheaper than anything half a mile away in downtown). It is clean and feels safe, and the breakfast is decent, but the rooms are pretty small and it has just a tiny bit of a rundown vibe (like the decor is a little older vibe and paint starting to peel around the floorboards). Kind of feels like something that used to be nice, but hasn't been fully kept up. If price is the most important factor, it's fine, but next time I'd probably check out one of the other nearby motels that cost $10 - $20 more.

Without having to worry about parking, I only arrived about 20 minutes before my start time. It was about 24° - with a "feels like" 12° - when I was getting dressed; I think it was closer to 30 by the time I finished, but it was definitely chilly the whole time! Fortunately, there was no rain or significant wind during the race as the area had had earlier in the week. There were only a small handful of places on the roads where ice from precipitation earlier in the week remained in shadowed spots; though it was cold enough for ice to form as water cups were tossed at aid stations - fortunately the volunteers were really great about warning about it!

I ended up wearing: 
  • Layer 1: Knee-length shorts, knee-high socks, t-shirt, arm-warmers.
  • Layer 2: Long running tights, long-sleeve (thick-ish - in between tee and sweatshirt materials) shirt with thumb-holes, gloves, headband.
  • Throwaway: scarf and sweatshirt. I tossed the sweatshirt at the start, but kept on the scarf until about mile 10.
I really wish I'd thought ahead to buy a cheap pair of sweatpants (thought ahead = prior to the night before. I did stop by a Walgreens, hoping to buy both sweatpants and a sweatshirt, but only found the latter. I swear I've seen cheap sweatpants at a Walgreens before, but either I'm imagining that or just this store didn't.). My legs were freezing beforehand, even though I wasn't waiting for that long.

I'd been warned that the course was hilly; overall it wasn't too bad, none of the hills were terribly long (and only one was all that steep), but it was a lot of up and down.

A couple miles are screwy because of the tunnel; see explanation after mile splits.
The parts around 3 that look like hills, whether green or white are actually hills.
The straight section at mile 4 is from being in the tunnel.


The course starts by Seattle Center, in front of the Experience Music Project, then south-ish through downtown, before heading onto I-90. Running along the freeway doesn't sound that interesting, but it also provided some nice views of downtown Seattle.

I think it was during mile 2 that I paused briefly to take off my arm-warmers. Next time, I'd use some cheaper (or home-made from tall socks) arm-warmers, as the ones I had on are high-quality with a silicone band at the top to keep them up. Normally a great feature, but not so great when you're trying to quickly rip them off from underneath a long-sleeve shirt! I thought I'd be able to do this while moving or at least walking, but ended up having to stop briefly to make it happen.


1 - 3: 12:53, 13:11, 13:02

It then goes through the tunnel, then heads along the water on Lake Washington (this section is nice and flat), before heading through some residential neighborhoods for a short bit. The tunnel was a nice respite from the cold for a bit, as well as a mostly flat, slightly down incline. Along the lake there were some beautiful views across of what I assume is downtown Bellevue. If I hadn't thought I'd be close to a PR, I definitely would have stopped for some photos!

4 - 7: 13:30*, 13:30*, 12:54, 13:23

The course then heads up through Washington Park Arboretum on beautiful wooded paved trails. Hilly, of course, but lovely. My right foot started hurting, which made it a little harder to run up hills, and took more walking breaks than I needed (cardio or leg-wise) because of that (and I apparently compensated for it with my left leg, resulting in an extraordinarily tight left IT that my massage therapist had to pound out a couple days later). 

8 - 10: 13:42, 12:43, 13:21

Then back through the northern edge of downtown back towards Seattle Center, finishing in Memorial Stadium. Someone really mean put some hills in the last mile - small, but really challenging at that point when you think you're so close!

11 - 13.1: 13:00, 12:17, 11:41, 4:12 time for .34 per Garmin (12:29 pace)

*The course goes through the I-90 Mount Baker Tunnel from about 3.75 to 4.4, blocking GPS signal. My Garmin extrapolated to catch back up after, so the total distance and time ended up correct, but the auto lap happened when it regained signal after the tunnel, not at the actual mile 4. Miles 4 and 5 showed 18:45 and 8:15 splits, respectively, between the times the auto lap recorded.

The half marathon had about 4,800 runners, plus a few hundred more walkers (who started 15 minutes later). I think anywhere from 2,000 - 5,000 is a pretty good size race - small enough that you're not completely squashed in a crowd, but large enough that even if you're at the back of the pack you won't be completely by yourself. Though there weren't separated corrals or waves, there were some pace groups with signs, so it seemed like people seeded themselves pretty well based on their speed relative to the pacers.

My official time is 2:52:15, which is a few minutes off my PR, but I'm pretty proud of this race nonetheless. Sure, I could have done better training, more speedwork, longer long runs. But considering mostly-decent training and a hilly course, I really did put out close to my best effort.

This really was a beautiful course and well-organized race (with a cute comfy shirt and pretty medal), and although future weather on this race day will likely be low 40s, windy, and rainy, I'm tempted to make it a tradition whenever we're in Tacoma for Thanksgiving!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...